<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Brendan Calling &#187; kudos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brendancalling.com/category/kudos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brendancalling.com</link>
	<description>&#34;living in an alternative universe of permanent outrage and relentless negativity fostered and fueled by the blogosphere.&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 19:12:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Porn Star Stormy Daniels to Challenge David &#8220;Diapers&#8221; Vitter?</title>
		<link>http://brendancalling.com/2009/02/25/porn-star-stormy-daniels-to-challenge-david-diapers-vitter/</link>
		<comments>http://brendancalling.com/2009/02/25/porn-star-stormy-daniels-to-challenge-david-diapers-vitter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 20:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brendan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Republican perverts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[calling bullshit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[just desserts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kudos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lying republican filth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[right wing dingalings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sheer unadulterated joy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brendancalling.com/?p=4698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Via TPM: &#8220;I defy you not to be charmed.&#8221;
And the fact is daniels IS charming. And funny: listen to her basically call Vitter a pervert, saying &#8220;I guess the biggest difference is I&#8217;m open with my sexual activity&#8220;, and then say he should be in jail, saying &#8220;i might be a porn star, but at [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/15dEDls8zy4&#038;color1=0xb1b1b1&#038;color2=0xcfcfcf&#038;feature=player_embedded&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/15dEDls8zy4&#038;color1=0xb1b1b1&#038;color2=0xcfcfcf&#038;feature=player_embedded&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
<p>Via <a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/02/the-democrats-case-for-drafting-stormy-daniels.php">TPM</a>: &#8220;I defy you not to be charmed.&#8221;</p>
<p>And the fact is daniels IS charming. And funny: listen to her basically call Vitter a pervert, saying &#8220;I guess the biggest difference is <i>I&#8217;m open with my sexual activity</i>&#8220;, and then say he should be in jail, saying &#8220;i might be a porn star, but at least i haven&#8217;t done anything illegal. And I guess the big question is not just &#8216;why is David Vitter in office&#8217; but &#8216;why is he not in jail&#8217;? I think he&#8217;s setting a horrible example&#8230;if they think thart <i>I&#8217;m</i> a better choice, what does that say?&#8221;</p>
<p>You go Stormy Daniels, you GO!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://brendancalling.com/2009/02/25/porn-star-stormy-daniels-to-challenge-david-diapers-vitter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chris Dodd for Majority Leader</title>
		<link>http://brendancalling.com/2007/12/18/chris-dodd-for-majority-leader/</link>
		<comments>http://brendancalling.com/2007/12/18/chris-dodd-for-majority-leader/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 16:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brendan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Good Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[direct action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impeachment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kudos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brendancalling.com/2007/12/18/chris-dodd-for-majority-leader/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank God for Chris Dodd.

Harry Reid, the telecom&#8217;s best friend and the not-so-secret ally of the opposition Republicans, has been humiliated:
Amid deep and growing divisions among Senate Democrats, Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.) last night abruptly withdrew legislation that would have changed surveillance law and granted the nation&#8217;s telecommunications companies retroactive immunity from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://firedoglake.com/2007/12/17/breaking-reid-pulling-telecom-bill/">Thank God</a> for <a href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/index.html">Chris Dodd</a>.</p>
<p><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/-I4Z0_dyFMc&#038;rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/-I4Z0_dyFMc&#038;rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object></p>
<p><a href="http://brendancalling.com/2007/10/18/harry-reid-hearts-att/">Harry Reid</a>, the <a href="http://opensecrets.org/politicians/contrib.asp?CID=N00009922&#038;cycle=2006">telecom&#8217;s best friend</a> and the <a href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2007/12/17/reid/index.html">not-so-secret ally of the opposition Republicans</a>, has been <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12/17/AR2007121700872.html?hpid=sec-politics">humiliated</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Amid deep and growing divisions among Senate Democrats, Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.) last night abruptly withdrew legislation that would have changed surveillance law and granted the nation&#8217;s telecommunications companies retroactive immunity from lawsuits charging they had violated privacy rights.<br />
[snip]<br />
Sen. Christopher J. Dodd (D-Conn.) &#8212; a presidential candidate who returned from Iowa Sunday night to fight the measure &#8212; quickly claimed victory after the bill&#8217;s withdrawal, and he again vowed to &#8220;utilize all the tools available&#8221; to block passage once Reid calls it up in January.</p>
<p>&#8220;He blinked,&#8221; Caroline Fredrickson, director of the Washington office of the American Civil Liberties Union, said of Reid. &#8220;It&#8217;s clear that this was not going to be easy. <b>On the one hand he wanted to rush this process and think he could strong-arm everybody to giving up their rights as senators. They threw sand in the gears.&#8221;</b></p>
<p>Reid spokesman Jim Manley said the decision had nothing to do with the efforts of Dodd and his allies. Indeed, for most of yesterday, Dodd appeared to be fighting a losing battle. His initial filibuster effort was steamrolled when the Senate voted 76 to 10 to take up the measure at noon.</p>
<p>Dodd vowed he will continue to try to scuttle the bill, which passed with bipartisan support out of the Senate intelligence committee, but he acknowledged &#8220;significant divisions&#8221; among his fellow Democrats. </p></blockquote>
<p>Chris Dodd bought us time. <a href="http://chrisdodd.com/">Reward good behavior</a>.</p>
<p>And then have some fun: Harry Reid&#8217;s office can be reached at 202-224-3542.  Dial &#8220;1&#8243; to speak to a staffer, and ask them to extend your congratulations to Chris Dodd, because boy oh boy are they PISSED today in <a href="http://reid.senate.gov/contact/email_form.cfm">Harry Pussy&#8217;s office</a>.  Here&#8217;s how my call went:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>&#8220;Sir, you&#8217;re aware that you&#8217;ve called Harry Reid&#8217;s office and we can&#8217;t pass along that message to Senator Dodd?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Sure I am. But I&#8217;m not asking you to send that message to Chris Dodd. I want you to send my message to Senator Reid. Please tell the Senator that I support Chris Dodd 100% and that if the vote comes to the floor again, I&#8217;m going to urge him to do it all over again.  I think Senator Dodd is a GREAT leader, and maybe he should have Senator Reid&#8217;s job.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>The woman&#8217;s response was dripping with venom.  Hilarious, impotent, humiliated venom.  After that, call <a href="http://dodd.senate.gov/index.php?q=node/3130">Chris Dodd&#8217;s office</a>, and give him the thanks he deserves for standing up for our inalienable right against undue search and seizure.<br />
Dodd&#8217;s never going to win the presidency, even though he deserves it far more than <a href="http://www.boomantribune.com/story/2007/12/17/235834/10">Bigmouth Dolittles like Joe Biden, Barack Obama, and Hillary Clinton, none of who could be bothered to honor their promises to support their colleague&#8217;s efforts to defend our Fourth Amendment rights</a>.</p>
<p>Kinda surprising about Biden: I would have figured he&#8217;d welcome any opportunity to flap his gums for a few hours.  I&#8217;ve never seen a politician so in love with the sound of his own voice, droning on and on and on.</p>
<p>Again, <a href="http://chrisdodd.com/">reward good behavior</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://brendancalling.com/2007/12/18/chris-dodd-for-majority-leader/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My Ex Has a Good Idea</title>
		<link>http://brendancalling.com/2007/10/25/my-ex-has-a-good-idea/</link>
		<comments>http://brendancalling.com/2007/10/25/my-ex-has-a-good-idea/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 17:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brendan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kudos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parenting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brendancalling.com/2007/10/25/my-ex-has-a-good-idea/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bet you never thought you&#8217;d see a headline like that here at Brendan Calling, but it&#8217;s true: Sam&#8217;s mom had an excellent idea to bridge the geography while Sam is in Canada.
It&#8217;s so difficult, for obvious reasons, to parent when Sam is away, but the two worst obstacles are his understandable difficulty carrying on a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bet you never thought you&#8217;d see a headline like that here at Brendan Calling, but it&#8217;s true: Sam&#8217;s mom had an excellent idea to bridge the geography while Sam is in Canada.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s so difficult, for obvious reasons, to parent when Sam is away, but the two worst obstacles are his understandable difficulty carrying on a phone conversation, and my physical absence: he simply doesn&#8217;t get much face time with me.</p>
<p>But last night on the phone, Mummy made a great suggestion. &#8220;Why don&#8217;t we invest in webcams, Brendan?&#8221; she asked. &#8220;When I was at Penn, I always used a webcam to talk to people online, and since the phone isn&#8217;t involved, there shouldn&#8217;t be any long distance charges.  You and Sam would be able to see each other, and it might make phone conversations easier.&#8221;</p>
<p>It IS an excellent idea.  After work, I have to figure out if my computer is capable of doing that.</p>
<p>So if you&#8217;re reading today, kudos: it&#8217;s a great idea, and if we can make it work&#8230; well, I still don&#8217;t owe you one, but you scored some brownie points with your notoriously dickish ex.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://brendancalling.com/2007/10/25/my-ex-has-a-good-idea/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

